Case Study:

Improvements blocked in Surrey at New Addington

Selection of local comments about the scam:

‘This outcome has nothing to do with a group of people genuinely seeking to protect the legitimate use of an amenity as a traditional village green. Rather it’s a case of exploiting legislation to block a lawful development that would have brought all kinds of benefits to people living in one of the most deprived wards in the country.

‘I could understand the legitimacy of a challenge if the space had been a well-established focal point for recreational pastimes. But for the technical argument to be won on the basis of the space - being used as little more than a dog toilet really - shows that the Act is in need of urgent review.’

Councillor Mike Fisher

‘I have been here for 30 years and it has never been used as a green in all the time I have been here.’

Ken Burgess, Chairman, Central Parade Business Partnership

‘It is disappointing that a law originally conceived in the 19th century has been used to stifle a properly approved development project with widespread public benefits.’

Jon Rouse, Council Chief Executive

The fragmented scraps of land, alleged by the applicant to be a ‘village green’ but in fact used principally as a dogs’ toilet, can be seen in the background to this picture.  It was taken in March 2009 on Central Parade, which will not now benefit from regeneration.

Back to Case Studies

The proposal to be frustrated using the scam:

Regeneration of a local town, providing much-needed new community facilities and purpose-built NHS health centre

Proposer of development:

Supermarket and Croydon Primary Healthcare Trust

Status of property owner:

Mixed ownership

Individual claiming that the owner’s property is a ‘town or village green’ and making the application:

Michael Fuller of Overbury Crescent

Place:

New Addington, Croydon, Surrey